― Sigmund Freud, “The Moses of Michelangelo” (1914), Standard Edition, Vol. XIII, p. 211.
“I may say at once that I am no connoisseur in art, but simply a layman.”
“I may say at once that I am no connoisseur in art, but simply a layman. I have often observed that the subject-matter of works of art has a stronger attraction for me than their formal and technical qualities, though to the artist their value lies first and foremost in these latter. I am unable rightly to appreciate many of the methods used and the effects obtained in art.… Nevertheless, works of art do exercise a powerful effect on me, especially those of literature and sculpture, less often of painting. This has occasioned me, when I have been contemplating such things, to spend a long time before them trying to apprehend them in my own way, i.e., to explain to myself what their effect is due to. Wherever I cannot do this, as for instance with music, I am almost incapable of obtaining any pleasure. Some rationalistic, or perhaps analytic, turn of mind in me rebels against being moved by a thing without knowing why I am thus affected and what it is that affects me.”
― Sigmund Freud, “The Moses of Michelangelo” (1914), Standard Edition, Vol. XIII, p. 211.
― Sigmund Freud, “The Moses of Michelangelo” (1914), Standard Edition, Vol. XIII, p. 211.
Bartleby, the Scrivener: “I would prefer not to.” |